<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1759 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294947</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for reevaluation, emphasizing the need for the appellant to substantiate their claim with evidence. The decision highlighted the importance of proper documentation and evidence in availing Cenvat credit and clearing inputs to resolve the disputed duty demand effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 08:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1759 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294947</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for reevaluation, emphasizing the need for the appellant to substantiate their claim with evidence. The decision highlighted the importance of proper documentation and evidence in availing Cenvat credit and clearing inputs to resolve the disputed duty demand effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>