<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1950 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294958</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned orders, and remitted the matters for a fair reassessment process. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to legal principles and natural justice in tax assessments. The second respondent was directed to provide necessary details, allow time for objections, conduct a personal hearing, and redo the assessments lawfully based on assessment guidelines outlined by the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 08:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1950 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294958</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned orders, and remitted the matters for a fair reassessment process. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to legal principles and natural justice in tax assessments. The second respondent was directed to provide necessary details, allow time for objections, conduct a personal hearing, and redo the assessments lawfully based on assessment guidelines outlined by the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>