<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 331 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407452</link>
    <description>The writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to exhaust the appellate remedy under Section 35-B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, by filing an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal within 30 days. The Tribunal was instructed to adjudicate the matter on merits, providing an opportunity to all parties concerned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 331 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407452</link>
      <description>The writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to exhaust the appellate remedy under Section 35-B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, by filing an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal within 30 days. The Tribunal was instructed to adjudicate the matter on merits, providing an opportunity to all parties concerned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>