<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 318 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Applicant&#039;s claim was rightly classified as &#039;Unsecured&#039; due to the failure to register the charge as required by law. The application was also deemed time-barred, as it was filed well beyond the 14-day period stipulated under Section 42 of the IB Code. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the application, emphasizing the importance of adhering to specific rules and regulations to maintain the sanctity of the liquidation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 08:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 318 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Applicant&#039;s claim was rightly classified as &#039;Unsecured&#039; due to the failure to register the charge as required by law. The application was also deemed time-barred, as it was filed well beyond the 14-day period stipulated under Section 42 of the IB Code. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the application, emphasizing the importance of adhering to specific rules and regulations to maintain the sanctity of the liquidation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>