<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 301 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that the assessee did not meet the criteria for writing off the bad debt under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 08:36:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 301 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that the assessee did not meet the criteria for writing off the bad debt under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>