<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 299 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407420</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the revenue challenging the restriction of addition to 12.5% of bogus purchases and the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was dismissed. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, ruling in favor of the assessee against the revenue. The CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning, based on the business model of the assessee and proper application of relevant legal provisions, was found to be justifiable and correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 299 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407420</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the revenue challenging the restriction of addition to 12.5% of bogus purchases and the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was dismissed. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, ruling in favor of the assessee against the revenue. The CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning, based on the business model of the assessee and proper application of relevant legal provisions, was found to be justifiable and correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>