<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407419</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The exemption under Section 10(34) for dividend income was affirmed, and the addition on account of negative reserves was deleted. The decisions were supported by judicial precedents and provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the Insurance Act, 1938. The ITAT found no grounds to overturn the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoned conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 08:35:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407419</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The exemption under Section 10(34) for dividend income was affirmed, and the addition on account of negative reserves was deleted. The decisions were supported by judicial precedents and provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the Insurance Act, 1938. The ITAT found no grounds to overturn the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoned conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>