<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1705 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the liability to pay interest on the differential amount of duty but setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules 2002. The decision was based on the interpretation of legal provisions and precedents established by the Higher Courts, ensuring a fair outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 08:35:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1705 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the liability to pay interest on the differential amount of duty but setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules 2002. The decision was based on the interpretation of legal provisions and precedents established by the Higher Courts, ensuring a fair outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>