<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1458 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294945</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Tribunal regarding deductions claimed under various sections of the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s claims under Sections 35D, 36, 37(4), and 80HHC were disallowed due to insufficient proof or failure to meet specific criteria. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision and dismissed the appeal, affirming the disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 08:35:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1458 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294945</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Tribunal regarding deductions claimed under various sections of the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s claims under Sections 35D, 36, 37(4), and 80HHC were disallowed due to insufficient proof or failure to meet specific criteria. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision and dismissed the appeal, affirming the disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>