https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407399 The Tribunal dismissed the petition as the Petitioner failed to establish any acts of Oppression and Mismanagement against the Respondent No. 2 to Respondent No. 4. The Tribunal found that the actions complained of were in accordance with the MOU and family arrangement between the parties, including legitimate property transfers and business decisions. The Petitioner's claims were deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the dismissal of the petition under Sections 241 & 242 of the Companies Act, 2013. en-us Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 May 2021 08:50:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407399 The Tribunal dismissed the petition as the Petitioner failed to establish any acts of Oppression and Mismanagement against the Respondent No. 2 to Respondent No. 4. The Tribunal found that the actions complained of were in accordance with the MOU and family arrangement between the parties, including legitimate property transfers and business decisions. The Petitioner's claims were deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the dismissal of the petition under Sections 241 & 242 of the Companies Act, 2013. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407399