<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 275 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407396</link>
    <description>A debenture-based claim was treated as a financial debt because the trust deed, payment records, admissions of delay and information utility entries showed non-payment of coupon amounts and redemption instalments, establishing default for section 7 admission. The Tribunal held that, at the admission stage, the adjudicating authority must only be satisfied from records and other reliable evidence that a debt is due and default has occurred. It also rejected the argument that initiation required consent of 51% of debenture holders, finding that the trust deed did not make declaration of default contingent on that approval and that the contractual mechanism treated non-response as deemed consent. The application was therefore maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 08:50:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 275 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407396</link>
      <description>A debenture-based claim was treated as a financial debt because the trust deed, payment records, admissions of delay and information utility entries showed non-payment of coupon amounts and redemption instalments, establishing default for section 7 admission. The Tribunal held that, at the admission stage, the adjudicating authority must only be satisfied from records and other reliable evidence that a debt is due and default has occurred. It also rejected the argument that initiation required consent of 51% of debenture holders, finding that the trust deed did not make declaration of default contingent on that approval and that the contractual mechanism treated non-response as deemed consent. The application was therefore maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>