<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 270 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the challenge against the altered distribution matrix but found the success fee for the Resolution Professional unreasonable. The Tribunal directed the equitable distribution of the success fee among employees, operational creditors, and unsecured creditors, emphasizing fairness. The application was partially allowed, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal provisions and ensuring equitable treatment of creditors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 19:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 270 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the challenge against the altered distribution matrix but found the success fee for the Resolution Professional unreasonable. The Tribunal directed the equitable distribution of the success fee among employees, operational creditors, and unsecured creditors, emphasizing fairness. The application was partially allowed, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal provisions and ensuring equitable treatment of creditors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>