https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294928 Additional evidence in appeal is not a matter of right and may be admitted only where the appellate court requires it to pronounce judgment or where some other substantial cause exists under Section 107(1)(d) read with Order XLI Rule 27 CPC. The rule cannot be used to patch up weaknesses in a party's case or fill evidentiary lacunae. Revisional interference with an interlocutory appellate order on such an application is unwarranted when the appeal is still pending and the appellate court can decide the request afresh. The High Court's interference was held unsustainable, and the matter was remitted to the first appellate court. en-us Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294928 Additional evidence in appeal is not a matter of right and may be admitted only where the appellate court requires it to pronounce judgment or where some other substantial cause exists under Section 107(1)(d) read with Order XLI Rule 27 CPC. The rule cannot be used to patch up weaknesses in a party's case or fill evidentiary lacunae. Revisional interference with an interlocutory appellate order on such an application is unwarranted when the appeal is still pending and the appellate court can decide the request afresh. The High Court's interference was held unsustainable, and the matter was remitted to the first appellate court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294928