<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1347 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294919</link>
    <description>Repeated anticipatory bail filings without any material change in circumstances were treated as forum shopping and an abuse of process. The text states that earlier applications had already been dismissed on merits or withdrawn in adverse circumstances, and the fresh petition did not disclose any new factual basis for reconsideration. It further records that the materials and conduct justified custodial interrogation and did not warrant exercise of discretion in favour of the petitioners. On that basis, anticipatory bail was refused and costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 13:15:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1347 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294919</link>
      <description>Repeated anticipatory bail filings without any material change in circumstances were treated as forum shopping and an abuse of process. The text states that earlier applications had already been dismissed on merits or withdrawn in adverse circumstances, and the fresh petition did not disclose any new factual basis for reconsideration. It further records that the materials and conduct justified custodial interrogation and did not warrant exercise of discretion in favour of the petitioners. On that basis, anticipatory bail was refused and costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>