<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s evidence overlooked, penalty under Income Tax Act section 271(1)(c) dismissed; circumstances adequately explained.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57885</link>
    <description>Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee has given evidences, on which no findings was given by Ld. CIT(A), in our view, the assessee reasonably explained the facts qua this addition before Ld. CIT(A. Therefore, in our view, this is not a fit case for sustaining the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 13:02:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 13:02:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s evidence overlooked, penalty under Income Tax Act section 271(1)(c) dismissed; circumstances adequately explained.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57885</link>
      <description>Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee has given evidences, on which no findings was given by Ld. CIT(A), in our view, the assessee reasonably explained the facts qua this addition before Ld. CIT(A. Therefore, in our view, this is not a fit case for sustaining the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 13:02:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>