<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1213 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294917</link>
    <description>The court found that the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by an NGO was an abuse of the court process, aimed at personal gain through beneficial legislation. The petitioner&#039;s actions were deemed improper, seeking to investigate and file an FIR against government officials and contractors for alleged corruption related to the Commonwealth Games. The misuse of the Right to Information (RTI) Act by the petitioner to obtain personal and invasive details was condemned as reflecting extreme vengeance. Emphasizing the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution, the court dismissed the petition, citing misuse of PIL and ordered costs to be paid to a charitable organization.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 10:02:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1213 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294917</link>
      <description>The court found that the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by an NGO was an abuse of the court process, aimed at personal gain through beneficial legislation. The petitioner&#039;s actions were deemed improper, seeking to investigate and file an FIR against government officials and contractors for alleged corruption related to the Commonwealth Games. The misuse of the Right to Information (RTI) Act by the petitioner to obtain personal and invasive details was condemned as reflecting extreme vengeance. Emphasizing the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution, the court dismissed the petition, citing misuse of PIL and ordered costs to be paid to a charitable organization.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>