<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 257 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407378</link>
    <description>Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 requires a reasonable opportunity of being heard, including personal hearing, before assessment is completed. Because the assessee was not granted that hearing and the record did not justify denial of the opportunity, the assessment order could not be sustained. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after affording reasonable opportunity and personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 08:19:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 257 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407378</link>
      <description>Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 requires a reasonable opportunity of being heard, including personal hearing, before assessment is completed. Because the assessee was not granted that hearing and the record did not justify denial of the opportunity, the assessment order could not be sustained. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after affording reasonable opportunity and personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>