<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 254 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407375</link>
    <description>For deduction under section 80IA(8), the market value of electricity transferred from a captive power plant to the manufacturing unit was benchmarked against the tariff the consuming unit would pay to the State Electricity Board in open-market conditions, not against a regulated long-term power purchase agreement rate. The Tribunal treated the Board tariff as a reliable external comparable, accepted the CUP method as the most appropriate method for this limited exercise, and held that the manufacturing unit could be the tested party. The transfer pricing adjustment was deleted and the deduction was to be recomputed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 254 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407375</link>
      <description>For deduction under section 80IA(8), the market value of electricity transferred from a captive power plant to the manufacturing unit was benchmarked against the tariff the consuming unit would pay to the State Electricity Board in open-market conditions, not against a regulated long-term power purchase agreement rate. The Tribunal treated the Board tariff as a reliable external comparable, accepted the CUP method as the most appropriate method for this limited exercise, and held that the manufacturing unit could be the tested party. The transfer pricing adjustment was deleted and the deduction was to be recomputed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>