<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 250 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407371</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, deleting the addition under Section 68 based on bogus entries and remanding the issue under Section 69 for further verification. Emphasizing compliance with CBDT directives and the real income theory, the Tribunal protected the assessee from penalties due to the accountant&#039;s errors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 08:18:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 250 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407371</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, deleting the addition under Section 68 based on bogus entries and remanding the issue under Section 69 for further verification. Emphasizing compliance with CBDT directives and the real income theory, the Tribunal protected the assessee from penalties due to the accountant&#039;s errors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>