<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 228 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407349</link>
    <description>Settlement of the financial creditor&#039;s claim had already been recorded and the company petition before the NCLT was disposed of on that basis. As no surviving grievance remained in the insolvency appeal, the appellant was permitted to withdraw it, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 08:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 228 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407349</link>
      <description>Settlement of the financial creditor&#039;s claim had already been recorded and the company petition before the NCLT was disposed of on that basis. As no surviving grievance remained in the insolvency appeal, the appellant was permitted to withdraw it, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>