https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294907 Clause 8.8 of the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 and its interaction with Section 24(2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 were under challenge, with the same legal issue pending before the Supreme Court. Applying the principle that a stayed order does not operate during the currency of the stay, the Delhi HC kept the impugned MCI order in abeyance to preserve the status quo until final resolution of the pending controversy. The impugned order dated 27 October 2012 and the appellate decision dated 10 December 2012 were stayed till disposal of the petition. en-us Mon, 05 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294907 Clause 8.8 of the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 and its interaction with Section 24(2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 were under challenge, with the same legal issue pending before the Supreme Court. Applying the principle that a stayed order does not operate during the currency of the stay, the Delhi HC kept the impugned MCI order in abeyance to preserve the status quo until final resolution of the pending controversy. The impugned order dated 27 October 2012 and the appellate decision dated 10 December 2012 were stayed till disposal of the petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294907