<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1543 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294912</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal related to Section 11A proceedings under the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the respondent was found not to have suppressed any material fact. The Court held that invoking Section 11A was not justified and left the interpretation of exemption Notification No. 32/99-C.E. for future examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 08:16:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1543 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294912</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal related to Section 11A proceedings under the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the respondent was found not to have suppressed any material fact. The Court held that invoking Section 11A was not justified and left the interpretation of exemption Notification No. 32/99-C.E. for future examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>