<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2024 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294910</link>
    <description>Criminal proceedings arising from a contractual dispute were not quashed because the FIR and charge-sheet disclosed prima facie allegations of cheating and criminal conspiracy, including supply of substandard turbine materials, false representation of chemical composition, and wrongful gain and loss. The High Court held that disputed questions of fact concerning material quality, contractual performance, departmental certificates, and the effect of arbitration could not be examined at the Section 482 stage. Since the defence version could not be tested before trial and the essential ingredients of the offences were not absent on the face of the record, the proceedings were allowed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 08:16:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2024 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294910</link>
      <description>Criminal proceedings arising from a contractual dispute were not quashed because the FIR and charge-sheet disclosed prima facie allegations of cheating and criminal conspiracy, including supply of substandard turbine materials, false representation of chemical composition, and wrongful gain and loss. The High Court held that disputed questions of fact concerning material quality, contractual performance, departmental certificates, and the effect of arbitration could not be examined at the Section 482 stage. Since the defence version could not be tested before trial and the essential ingredients of the offences were not absent on the face of the record, the proceedings were allowed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>