https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294886 Statutory appellate jurisdiction under the Bengal Medical Act, 1914 remained operative because the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 neither expressly nor by necessary implication repealed the State Act. The vested right of appeal continued, and the State Government remained the appellate forum for conduct predating the 2002 Regulations. Rule 8.8 of the 2002 Regulations, as subordinate legislation, could not override the parent statute or transfer appellate jurisdiction to the Medical Council of India; the latter had only a consultative role under the 1956 Act. Waiver and estoppel by conduct also applied where the petitioner participated in appellate proceedings before challenging the forum, and no jurisdictional or natural-justice defect justified writ intervention. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 May 2021 13:07:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294886 Statutory appellate jurisdiction under the Bengal Medical Act, 1914 remained operative because the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 neither expressly nor by necessary implication repealed the State Act. The vested right of appeal continued, and the State Government remained the appellate forum for conduct predating the 2002 Regulations. Rule 8.8 of the 2002 Regulations, as subordinate legislation, could not override the parent statute or transfer appellate jurisdiction to the Medical Council of India; the latter had only a consultative role under the 1956 Act. Waiver and estoppel by conduct also applied where the petitioner participated in appellate proceedings before challenging the forum, and no jurisdictional or natural-justice defect justified writ intervention. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294886