https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294886 The text explains that a statutory right of appeal under the Bengal Medical Act, 1914 was treated as a vested right and was not taken away by the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 or the 2002 Professional Conduct Regulations. It further notes that subordinate legislation such as Rule 8.8 could not override the parent Act or shift appellate jurisdiction away from the State Government where the State statute continued to operate. The article also states that participation in appellate proceedings, together with available statutory remedies, supported waiver and estoppel against writ challenge in the absence of jurisdictional error, illegality, or breach of natural justice. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 May 2021 13:07:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294886 The text explains that a statutory right of appeal under the Bengal Medical Act, 1914 was treated as a vested right and was not taken away by the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 or the 2002 Professional Conduct Regulations. It further notes that subordinate legislation such as Rule 8.8 could not override the parent Act or shift appellate jurisdiction away from the State Government where the State statute continued to operate. The article also states that participation in appellate proceedings, together with available statutory remedies, supported waiver and estoppel against writ challenge in the absence of jurisdictional error, illegality, or breach of natural justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294886