https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25374 A serious dispute over ownership of money represented by drafts, involving competing factual claims and the need to prove title, was held unsuitable for writ jurisdiction. The HC found that such controversies cannot be satisfactorily resolved on disputed facts requiring evidence, and therefore declined to adjudicate the ownership claim in writ proceedings. The parties were left to establish title and liability before the appropriate civil forum, and it was clarified that any later civil proceedings would not require notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. en-us Fri, 06 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:11:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25374 A serious dispute over ownership of money represented by drafts, involving competing factual claims and the need to prove title, was held unsuitable for writ jurisdiction. The HC found that such controversies cannot be satisfactorily resolved on disputed facts requiring evidence, and therefore declined to adjudicate the ownership claim in writ proceedings. The parties were left to establish title and liability before the appropriate civil forum, and it was clarified that any later civil proceedings would not require notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 06 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25374