<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 218 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407339</link>
    <description>A fraud classification framework with grave civil and penal consequences must be read consistently with natural justice where it does not expressly exclude a hearing. Prior disclosure of the relied-upon reports and a reasonable pre-decisional opportunity to respond were required before classifying the borrower&#039;s account as fraud. Because the borrower was not furnished the complete material and no effective hearing was given, the Joint Lenders Forum&#039;s fraud classification and the Fraud Identification Committee&#039;s confirmation were unsustainable. The fraud classification process was therefore set aside and reconsideration was directed after disclosure of the reports and a personal hearing to the affected parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2021 08:05:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 218 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407339</link>
      <description>A fraud classification framework with grave civil and penal consequences must be read consistently with natural justice where it does not expressly exclude a hearing. Prior disclosure of the relied-upon reports and a reasonable pre-decisional opportunity to respond were required before classifying the borrower&#039;s account as fraud. Because the borrower was not furnished the complete material and no effective hearing was given, the Joint Lenders Forum&#039;s fraud classification and the Fraud Identification Committee&#039;s confirmation were unsustainable. The fraud classification process was therefore set aside and reconsideration was directed after disclosure of the reports and a personal hearing to the affected parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>