<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 36 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25371</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Wealth-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to make fresh assessments for multiple years, allowing inclusion of previously unconsidered items and reassessment of exemption claims. The court ruled that wealth held by the assessee-trust did not qualify for exemption under section 5(1)(i) due to the trust&#039;s dominant non-charitable purpose. Additionally, the Tribunal&#039;s decision to include items not originally assessed during reassessments was affirmed. The method of valuation for properties occupied by tenants, based on the approved valuer&#039;s report, was upheld. A separate judgment disagreed with the majority view, arguing that income for public charitable purposes should be exempt from wealth-tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:02:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 36 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25371</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Wealth-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to make fresh assessments for multiple years, allowing inclusion of previously unconsidered items and reassessment of exemption claims. The court ruled that wealth held by the assessee-trust did not qualify for exemption under section 5(1)(i) due to the trust&#039;s dominant non-charitable purpose. Additionally, the Tribunal&#039;s decision to include items not originally assessed during reassessments was affirmed. The method of valuation for properties occupied by tenants, based on the approved valuer&#039;s report, was upheld. A separate judgment disagreed with the majority view, arguing that income for public charitable purposes should be exempt from wealth-tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>