<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1489 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294875</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that adjustments made under section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act were impermissible as the Assessing Officer failed to provide intimation. The enhancement of addition under section 11(1A)(a) by the CIT(A) without notice to the assessee was deemed unsustainable and deleted. The denial of credit for taxes paid/claimed was directed to be reconciled by the Assessing Officer according to the assessee&#039;s accounting method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2021 08:04:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1489 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294875</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that adjustments made under section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act were impermissible as the Assessing Officer failed to provide intimation. The enhancement of addition under section 11(1A)(a) by the CIT(A) without notice to the assessee was deemed unsustainable and deleted. The denial of credit for taxes paid/claimed was directed to be reconciled by the Assessing Officer according to the assessee&#039;s accounting method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>