https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294879 The suit for specific performance was found to be barred under Order 2 Rule 2 of the CPC due to the earlier suit for injunction, which had a complete identity of cause of action. The requirement of proving the plaint in the previous suit in evidence was upheld, and despite dismissing the appeal, the Court utilized its power under Article 142 to order the Defendant to refund the amounts paid by the Plaintiff with interest, ensuring complete justice between the parties. The judgment of the High Court was maintained. en-us Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 May 2021 08:04:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294879 The suit for specific performance was found to be barred under Order 2 Rule 2 of the CPC due to the earlier suit for injunction, which had a complete identity of cause of action. The requirement of proving the plaint in the previous suit in evidence was upheld, and despite dismissing the appeal, the Court utilized its power under Article 142 to order the Defendant to refund the amounts paid by the Plaintiff with interest, ensuring complete justice between the parties. The judgment of the High Court was maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294879