https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294882 Where the undisputed forest authority report showed that the rescued animals were exotic species outside the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, continued detention under that Act was not justified for bail purposes. The Court noted that the prosecution did not dispute that official record and that the matter appeared to raise a possible Customs law issue instead, although no investigation had been transferred to Customs. On that basis, the petitioners were entitled to bail in connection with the case under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. en-us Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 May 2021 08:04:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294882 Where the undisputed forest authority report showed that the rescued animals were exotic species outside the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, continued detention under that Act was not justified for bail purposes. The Court noted that the prosecution did not dispute that official record and that the matter appeared to raise a possible Customs law issue instead, although no investigation had been transferred to Customs. On that basis, the petitioners were entitled to bail in connection with the case under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294882