https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407315 The challenge to the attachment order was based on delayed service of the assessment order. The petitioner claimed the assessment order was received late via post, while the Government Advocate argued it was sent via email on the same day. Despite the dispute over the mode of service, the petitioner was allowed to file a statutory appeal within four weeks. The court suggested seeking interim relief from the first appellate authority regarding the bank account attachment, subject to providing necessary information for consideration. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs. en-us Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407315 The challenge to the attachment order was based on delayed service of the assessment order. The petitioner claimed the assessment order was received late via post, while the Government Advocate argued it was sent via email on the same day. Despite the dispute over the mode of service, the petitioner was allowed to file a statutory appeal within four weeks. The court suggested seeking interim relief from the first appellate authority regarding the bank account attachment, subject to providing necessary information for consideration. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs. Case-Laws GST Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407315