<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 193 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407314</link>
    <description>For deduction under section 80IB(10), open terrace area is not part of built-up area and cannot be used to disqualify a housing project. The completion period is to be reckoned from the last building plan approval governing the project as a whole, not from the first layout approval. A completion certificate issued by the competent local authority was held sufficient, so a separate CMDA completion certificate was unnecessary. The absence of registered title in the assessee&#039;s name did not bar relief where it acted as the real developer, having undertaken development and construction at its own risk. The statutory conditions for the deduction were therefore treated as satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 08:42:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 193 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407314</link>
      <description>For deduction under section 80IB(10), open terrace area is not part of built-up area and cannot be used to disqualify a housing project. The completion period is to be reckoned from the last building plan approval governing the project as a whole, not from the first layout approval. A completion certificate issued by the competent local authority was held sufficient, so a separate CMDA completion certificate was unnecessary. The absence of registered title in the assessee&#039;s name did not bar relief where it acted as the real developer, having undertaken development and construction at its own risk. The statutory conditions for the deduction were therefore treated as satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>