<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1697 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294849</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty and interest, imposed a penalty on the importer but restricted it to the duty amount, set aside the order of confiscation and redemption fine, and annulled penalties imposed on two individuals under Section 112(a) and (b). The appeals were partly allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 08:40:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1697 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294849</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty and interest, imposed a penalty on the importer but restricted it to the duty amount, set aside the order of confiscation and redemption fine, and annulled penalties imposed on two individuals under Section 112(a) and (b). The appeals were partly allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>