<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1930 (7) TMI 20 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294833</link>
    <description>Agreements for transfer were construed as covering both the village share and the cultivating rights in sir land, because the recitals, operative terms and matching consideration showed that the parties intended to include the attached sir and khudkast rights. Where transfer of such rights required Revenue Officer sanction, the promisor was impliedly bound to do all acts necessary to complete the transfer, including making the statutory application for sanction. The court treated specific performance as competent to enforce that obligation under the Specific Relief Act, and recognised that the decree could require steps needed to secure the sanction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 13:47:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1930 (7) TMI 20 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294833</link>
      <description>Agreements for transfer were construed as covering both the village share and the cultivating rights in sir land, because the recitals, operative terms and matching consideration showed that the parties intended to include the attached sir and khudkast rights. Where transfer of such rights required Revenue Officer sanction, the promisor was impliedly bound to do all acts necessary to complete the transfer, including making the statutory application for sanction. The court treated specific performance as competent to enforce that obligation under the Specific Relief Act, and recognised that the decree could require steps needed to secure the sanction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>