https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407287 The Court allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the detention order and declaring the officer's actions as arbitrary and violative of constitutional provisions. The respondents were directed to refund the amounts paid by the petitioner with interest. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering operational convenience and rejected the officer's mechanical approach, highlighting the need to prevent undue financial burden on individuals due to coercive actions by authorities. en-us Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407287 The Court allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the detention order and declaring the officer's actions as arbitrary and violative of constitutional provisions. The respondents were directed to refund the amounts paid by the petitioner with interest. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering operational convenience and rejected the officer's mechanical approach, highlighting the need to prevent undue financial burden on individuals due to coercive actions by authorities. Case-Laws GST Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407287