https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407280 The court found in favor of the petitioner, holding that the adjudicating authority's decision was unreasonable and lacked a comprehensive analysis of the dealership agreement. The court quashed the impugned order, allowed the writ petition, did not award costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. The court emphasized the importance of considering the agreement as a whole and upheld the petitioner's argument regarding the nature of their relationship with the manufacturers. en-us Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Dec 2021 17:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407280 The court found in favor of the petitioner, holding that the adjudicating authority's decision was unreasonable and lacked a comprehensive analysis of the dealership agreement. The court quashed the impugned order, allowed the writ petition, did not award costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. The court emphasized the importance of considering the agreement as a whole and upheld the petitioner's argument regarding the nature of their relationship with the manufacturers. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407280