<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407261</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to verify if the holding company had deducted TDS on the salary payments to deputed employees. The decision highlighted the need for concrete evidence to support claims and avoid disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 08:36:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407261</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to verify if the holding company had deducted TDS on the salary payments to deputed employees. The decision highlighted the need for concrete evidence to support claims and avoid disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>