<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 138 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407259</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code by the Operational Creditor against the Corporate Debtor. The claim for a debt of Rs. 24,71,337 plus interest was rejected as time-barred under the Law of Limitation. The Tribunal found that the acknowledgment of liability was made beyond the prescribed period, triggering a fresh period of limitation. Consequently, the petition was deemed ineligible for admission, and the appointment of a Resolution Professional was left to the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s discretion. The additional documents submitted by the Operational Creditor were disposed of without any order on costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 08:36:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 138 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407259</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code by the Operational Creditor against the Corporate Debtor. The claim for a debt of Rs. 24,71,337 plus interest was rejected as time-barred under the Law of Limitation. The Tribunal found that the acknowledgment of liability was made beyond the prescribed period, triggering a fresh period of limitation. Consequently, the petition was deemed ineligible for admission, and the appointment of a Resolution Professional was left to the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s discretion. The additional documents submitted by the Operational Creditor were disposed of without any order on costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>