<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 132 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407253</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred since it was filed beyond the statutory 90-day period, with no power for condonation of delay beyond the additional 30 days allowed under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing the strict adherence to the 90-day limit for filing appeals, as established by legal precedents and judgments, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 08:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 132 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407253</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as time-barred since it was filed beyond the statutory 90-day period, with no power for condonation of delay beyond the additional 30 days allowed under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing the strict adherence to the 90-day limit for filing appeals, as established by legal precedents and judgments, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>