https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294829 Contempt proceedings arising from an ex parte injunction were stayed until the main notice of motion was decided on merits. The Court emphasised that the primary application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 should be taken up first, and that Order XXXIX Rule 3A calls for early disposal of an ex parte injunction application. It noted that deciding collateral contempt issues before the main motion could prejudice the parties, especially where pleadings were complete and the application remained pending. The High Court was requested to decide the notice of motion expeditiously. en-us Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 May 2021 08:36:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294829 Contempt proceedings arising from an ex parte injunction were stayed until the main notice of motion was decided on merits. The Court emphasised that the primary application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 should be taken up first, and that Order XXXIX Rule 3A calls for early disposal of an ex parte injunction application. It noted that deciding collateral contempt issues before the main motion could prejudice the parties, especially where pleadings were complete and the application remained pending. The High Court was requested to decide the notice of motion expeditiously. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294829