<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1420 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294826</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no &quot;sufficient cause&quot; for the delay in filing the appeal by the Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax. The reasons given for the delay were considered insufficient and unconvincing. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stressing the significance of complying with statutory timelines and providing clear and credible justifications for any delays in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 08:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1420 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294826</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no &quot;sufficient cause&quot; for the delay in filing the appeal by the Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax. The reasons given for the delay were considered insufficient and unconvincing. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stressing the significance of complying with statutory timelines and providing clear and credible justifications for any delays in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>