<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1848 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294830</link>
    <description>Wilful disobedience of a surrender direction, coupled with prolonged hospital admission without meaningful medical justification, was treated as obstruction of the administration of justice and civil and criminal contempt. The record referred to 527 days of admission, repeated non-compliance with warrants, and conduct inconsistent with genuine indoor treatment. Medical professionals were also found to have aided the evasion by extending admission and providing cover for continued avoidance of arrest and court process. The judgment records contempt findings against both the respondent and the concerned professionals and defers sentence for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 08:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1848 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294830</link>
      <description>Wilful disobedience of a surrender direction, coupled with prolonged hospital admission without meaningful medical justification, was treated as obstruction of the administration of justice and civil and criminal contempt. The record referred to 527 days of admission, repeated non-compliance with warrants, and conduct inconsistent with genuine indoor treatment. Medical professionals were also found to have aided the evasion by extending admission and providing cover for continued avoidance of arrest and court process. The judgment records contempt findings against both the respondent and the concerned professionals and defers sentence for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>