https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294831 Ad interim stay of an order appointing an administrator pendente lite and directing committee oversight was refused because the probate court's power under Section 247 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 was not shown to have been exceeded on the materials then available. The Court noted that the administrator pendente lite acts under the immediate control of the probate court and represents the estate, while voting rights and shareholder control are governed by the Companies Act and controlling interest follows shareholding. As the impugned order was not shown to be perverse or outside the probate court's domain, it was allowed to operate pending final consideration of the stay applications and appeals. en-us Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 May 2021 08:36:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294831 Ad interim stay of an order appointing an administrator pendente lite and directing committee oversight was refused because the probate court's power under Section 247 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 was not shown to have been exceeded on the materials then available. The Court noted that the administrator pendente lite acts under the immediate control of the probate court and represents the estate, while voting rights and shareholder control are governed by the Companies Act and controlling interest follows shareholding. As the impugned order was not shown to be perverse or outside the probate court's domain, it was allowed to operate pending final consideration of the stay applications and appeals. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294831