<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1607 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the penalty imposed on a Private Limited Company for failing to file ER-6 Monthly Returns, reducing it to Rs. 500 per return totaling Rs. 18,000, considering the unintentional nature of the default and absence of revenue loss. The appellant&#039;s bonafide belief in an exemption from filing these returns under specific notifications was acknowledged, leading to a significant reduction in the penalty amount from the initial imposition of Rs. 1,80,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 19:43:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1607 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the penalty imposed on a Private Limited Company for failing to file ER-6 Monthly Returns, reducing it to Rs. 500 per return totaling Rs. 18,000, considering the unintentional nature of the default and absence of revenue loss. The appellant&#039;s bonafide belief in an exemption from filing these returns under specific notifications was acknowledged, leading to a significant reduction in the penalty amount from the initial imposition of Rs. 1,80,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>