https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294819 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that there was no recipient of service or consideration for the demolition and removal services provided. The impugned order confirming tax demand, interest, and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 was set aside due to lack of legal authority. The judgment extensively analyzed the transaction, tax liabilities, and considerations, ultimately allowing the appeal and absolving the appellant of tax liability for the services rendered to M/s Goldbrick Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 May 2021 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294819 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that there was no recipient of service or consideration for the demolition and removal services provided. The impugned order confirming tax demand, interest, and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 was set aside due to lack of legal authority. The judgment extensively analyzed the transaction, tax liabilities, and considerations, ultimately allowing the appeal and absolving the appellant of tax liability for the services rendered to M/s Goldbrick Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294819