https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25349 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the Wealth-tax Officer's orders were compliant with the Commissioner's directives under section 18(2A) of the Wealth-tax Act. The Court determined that the Wealth-tax Officer's actions were in conformity with the Commissioner's decision and did not violate any legal provisions. Consequently, the Court directed the assessee to pay Rs. 1,500 as costs to the Commissioner of Income-tax, Patiala within one month. en-us Tue, 04 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:57:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25349 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the Wealth-tax Officer's orders were compliant with the Commissioner's directives under section 18(2A) of the Wealth-tax Act. The Court determined that the Wealth-tax Officer's actions were in conformity with the Commissioner's decision and did not violate any legal provisions. Consequently, the Court directed the assessee to pay Rs. 1,500 as costs to the Commissioner of Income-tax, Patiala within one month. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Tue, 04 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25349