<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 195 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294809</link>
    <description>Disobedience of a temporary injunction granted by a subordinate court is to be addressed under Order 39 Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, because that provision gives the court that issued the injunction the direct mechanism to examine breach and impose consequences. The general contempt jurisdiction under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is not the proper route where the Code provides a specific enforcement remedy. A person who was not a party to the suit and is alleged only to have aided or abetted the breach cannot be proceeded against as a contemner on that basis outside the statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 14:43:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 195 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294809</link>
      <description>Disobedience of a temporary injunction granted by a subordinate court is to be addressed under Order 39 Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, because that provision gives the court that issued the injunction the direct mechanism to examine breach and impose consequences. The general contempt jurisdiction under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is not the proper route where the Code provides a specific enforcement remedy. A person who was not a party to the suit and is alleged only to have aided or abetted the breach cannot be proceeded against as a contemner on that basis outside the statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>