https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294806 Wilful contempt requires proof of deliberate disobedience of earlier court directions; where respondents acted on legal advice, counsel accepted responsibility, and the record showed no intentional non-compliance, contempt was not established. The Court treated the conduct as lacking the requisite contumacious intent and granted time to complete implementation of the earlier directions in full spirit, with the contempt petitions dismissed. en-us Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 May 2021 13:18:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294806 Wilful contempt requires proof of deliberate disobedience of earlier court directions; where respondents acted on legal advice, counsel accepted responsibility, and the record showed no intentional non-compliance, contempt was not established. The Court treated the conduct as lacking the requisite contumacious intent and granted time to complete implementation of the earlier directions in full spirit, with the contempt petitions dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294806