<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 128 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407249</link>
    <description>In a bail matter under the Customs Act, 1962, the Court considered allegations of gold smuggling, the seizure value, the applicant&#039;s attributed role, and the fact that co-accused had already been enlarged on bail. Applying parity and the circumstances of the seizure, the Court found that similar treatment was justified, subject to appropriate safeguards. Bail was granted to the applicant with conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 08:53:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 128 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407249</link>
      <description>In a bail matter under the Customs Act, 1962, the Court considered allegations of gold smuggling, the seizure value, the applicant&#039;s attributed role, and the fact that co-accused had already been enlarged on bail. Applying parity and the circumstances of the seizure, the Court found that similar treatment was justified, subject to appropriate safeguards. Bail was granted to the applicant with conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>