<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 63 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25344</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Rs. 25,000 received by the assessee for assisting in the sale of shares and setting up a factory was exempt from tax under section 10(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court determined that the receipt was a casual and non-recurring windfall, not arising from the assessee&#039;s business or profession. The payment was considered exempt from tax, and the Department was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:46:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 63 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25344</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Rs. 25,000 received by the assessee for assisting in the sale of shares and setting up a factory was exempt from tax under section 10(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court determined that the receipt was a casual and non-recurring windfall, not arising from the assessee&#039;s business or profession. The payment was considered exempt from tax, and the Department was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>